Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Jeffrey Sigmon v. Jeffrey Cassidy
as 26-5715
Petitioner:
JEFFREY EDWARD SIGMON
Respondent:
JEFFREY CASSIDY, Sheriff
Sigmon v. Storen et al
as 6:2026cv00057
Plaintiff:
Brittney Ann Sigmon
Defendant:
Duke Storen, Kathy Bowes, Jay Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sigmon v. Cassidy
as 2:2026cv00060
Petitioner:
Jeffrey E. Sigmon
Respondent:
Jeffrey Cassidy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
David Meyers v. R. Honeycutt
as 26-6198
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
R. HONEYCUTT, Warden, AMY JENKINS, Warden, DANIEL BROWN, Warden and others
David Meyers v. Chris Biecker
as 26-6200
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
CHRIS BIECKER, MILLER, Captain, R. HONEYCUTT, Warden and others
Sigmon v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al
as 4:2026cv01057
Plaintiff:
Cassie Sigmon
Defendant:
Meta Platforms, Inc., Instagram LLC, Facebook Payments, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
White v. Phillips et al
as 5:2025cv00218
Plaintiff:
Bridget White
Defendant:
Kadey Phillips, Candace Galliher, Lauren Vaughan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv01806
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 ad - Americans with Disabilities Act
Acosta et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2025cv12493
Defendant:
3M Company, Carrier Fire & Security Americas, LLC,, Carrier Fire & Security Corporation, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Bernardo Acosta, Duron Adams, Syed Ahmed and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Abrams, Jr. et al v. AGC Chemicals Americas, Inc. et al
as 2:2025cv11938
Plaintiff:
Danny Abrams, Jr., Alice Achtzehn, Charles Adams and others
Defendant:
AGC Chemicals Americas, Inc., Amerex Corporation, Archroma U.S., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
