Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-3733
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Shahood v. Toyota Financial Services et al
as 2:2026cv00057
Plaintiff:
Jennifer P. Shahood
Defendant:
Toyota Financial Services, Vincent Bray, April W. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Parker v. Derrick et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2026cv00423
Plaintiff:
Caderrius Santiez Parker
Defendant:
Todd Derrick and Skip Duffie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ronald Marshall v. Skip Henderson, et al
as 26-11822
Defendant:
SKIP HENDERSON, R. GARY ALLEN, ISAIAH HUGLEY and others
Plaintiff:
RONALD RAY MARSHALL
ANDERSON v. THE STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 3:2026cv00058
Plaintiff:
KYRIMA ANDERSON
Defendant:
THE STATE OF GEORGIA, GA SUPREME COURT, JUDGE MIKE BURKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burgos v. Davis et al
as 8:2026cv01828
Plaintiff:
Henry I. Burgos
Defendant:
Dereck E. Davis, Detective Sgt. Michael Sauer, Tracey Douglas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Braver v. Wachob Oil & Gas, LLC et al
as 4:2026cv00267
Plaintiff:
Skip Braver
Defendant:
Wachob Oil & Gas, LLC, WIT Services Co., LLC, Xpedite Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Swint v. Skip
as 4:2026cv00252
Plaintiff:
Robert James Swint
Defendant:
Ahrbor Skip
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00788
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Gutberlet v. City and County of Denver, Colorado et al
as 1:2026cv01601
Plaintiff:
Margaret Gutberlet
Defendant:
City and County of Denver, Colorado, Robert Wyckoff, Aaron Rebeterano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
