Cases 1 - 10 of 633
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00204
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04116
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02158
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01226
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Irankunda v. King Law Firm et al
as 4:2024cv04070
Plaintiff:
Eric Janson Irankunda
Defendant:
King Law Firm, Boyce Law Firm and Smithfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Johnson v. Smithfield Hog Production et al
as 5:2024cv00195
Plaintiff:
Bradley J. Johnson
Defendant:
Smithfield Hog Production and First Line Farm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00229
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Flohrs, Jr v. Smithfield Packaged Meats Corp.
as 4:2024cv04055
Plaintiff:
Charles W. Flohrs, Jr.
Defendant:
Smithfield Packaged Meats Corp. and ESIS, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
John Alexander v. B. Myers, et al
as 24-1239
Plaintiff:
JOHN ALEXANDER
Defendant:
B. MYERS, Corrections Lieutenant- SCI Smithfield, SPECK, Corrections Lieutenant SCI-Smithfield, WISER, Corrections Lieutenant SCI-Smithfield and others
United States of America v. Smithfield Foods, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Andre Polk
Garnishee:
Smithfield Foods Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Recovery of Debt to US
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
