Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv02528
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12111
Martin v. Sheriff Moore et al
as 6:2021cv00049
Plaintiff:
Jack Lydell Martin
Defendant:
Mike Newell, J D Snoody, Lee Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Clarke et al
as 7:2020cv00533
Defendant:
Ms. C. Bryant, Mr. G. Sink, Ms. R. Trent and others
Plaintiff:
Marquis Robert Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fite v. Whitman et al
as 6:2020cv00054
Defendant:
Winston County Correctional Facility, Jim Stein, JB Snoody and others
Plaintiff:
Ryan Justin Fite
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COOPER et al v. VAUGHT et al
as 1:2017cv01114
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN ACADEMY OF IMPLANT DENTISTRY and CRAIG COOPER
Defendant:
JENNIFER K BARTEK, GREGORY A. BERGER, MARA CATEY-WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Daley v. Asresahegn et al
as 8:2015cv01412
Plaintiff:
Shomari Salim Daley
Defendant:
Meskerem Asresahegn, MD, Prince George's County Police Department, M. Andree Green and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 fa Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation-False Arrest
Stokes v. Jeffrey et al
as 3:2013cv00256
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Stokes
Defendant:
Jeffrey and Snoodi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 2:2012cv00170
Plaintiff:
Lawrence C. Jenkins , Melvin D. Snoody and Rickie L. Williams
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
John Ward v. John Snoddy, et al
as 12-10699
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN FRANKLIN WARD
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN SNOODY, in his individual and official capacity, ANTHONY NIX, in his individual and official capacity, BAKER, Jail Custodian and others
Ward v. Snoody et al
as 6:2011cv00112
Plaintiff:
John Franklin Ward
Defendant:
John Snoody , Anthony Nix , Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
