Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Clark v. Unknown Party et al
as 4:2023cv00163
Plaintiff:
Michael Stanley Clark
Defendant:
Unknown Party and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Clark v. Unknown Party
as 4:2023cv00032
Petitioner:
Michael Stanley Clark
Respondent:
Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
USA v. Clark
as 22-30645
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Michael Stanley Clark, also known as cleverly concocted, also known as bossiercopssuck, also known as Barb Riley, also known as John Longson, also known as clarkbrothersla
Clark v. Unknown Parties
as 4:2022cv00084
Petitioner:
Michael Stanley Clark
Respondent:
Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
CLARK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv10779
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
STANLEY CLARK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clark v. USA
as 3:2019cv00145
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Michael Stanley Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Clark v. Ettienne et al
as 1:2015cv04961
Plaintiff:
Stanley Clark
Defendant:
John and Jane Doe 1 through 10, Vaughan Ettienne, Ryan Galvin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Henry Martin, Jr. v. William Byars, Jr.
as 13-7326
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HENRY W. MARTIN, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM ROBERT BYARS, JR., Director, DR. MOORE, Director of Medical Services, DR. T. BYRNE, ACI and others
Defendant:
JAMIE R. WRESSEY, RN Health Care Authority SC Dept of Corrections, DANIEL MURPHY, Department of Corrections Division Inspection SCDC, ALTHEA B. MYERS, Chief Deputy Office of the Investigation & Enforcement and others
Clarke v. State of California et al
as 1:2013cv00049
Petitioner:
Stanley Clarke
Respondent:
State of California and Madera County Probation Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
