Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1130
Plaintiff / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae: Plaintiff v. Defendant
State of Oregon v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv03633
Defendant: Dupont De Nemours Inc, EIDP Inc, 3M Company and others
Plaintiff: State of Oregon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1078
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae: Plaintiff v. Defendant
City of Camden et al v. 3M Company We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv03147
Plaintiff: City of Camden, City of Brockton, City of Sioux Falls and others
Defendant: 3M Company
Interested Party: State of Colorado, State of Hawaii, State of Maine and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION et al v. SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION AG et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00828
Plaintiff: FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF COLORADO and others
Defendant: SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION AG, SYNGENTA CORPORATION, SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0053 Federal Trade Commission Act
Amer College of Obstetricians v. FDA
as 20-1824
Plaintiff / Appellee: HONOR MACNAUGHTON, M.D., NEW YORK STATE ACADEMY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS, on behalf of its members and members' patients, AMERICAN COLLEGE OF OBSTETRICIANS AND GYNECOLOGISTS, on behalf of its members and members' patients and others
Defendant / Appellant: STEPHAN HAHN, M.D., in his official capacity of Commissioner of Food and Drugs, and his employees, agents and successors in office, ALEX AZAR, in his official capacity of Secretary, United States Department of of Health and Human Services, and his employees, agents and successors in office, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES and others
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF MICHIGAN, STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, STATE OF MISSOURI and others
Clervrain v. Hoover et al
as 3:2020cv00068
Defendant: United States District Court for the District of California, United States Department Office of the Labor, State of Hawaii Office of the Secretary and others
Plaintiff: Manetirony Clervrain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Intl Refugee Assistance v. Donald J. Trump
as 17-1351
Plaintiff / Appellee: INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT, a project of the Urban Justice Center, Inc., on behalf of itself and its clients, HIAS, INC., on behalf of itself and its clients, MUHAMMED METEAB and others
Defendant / Appellant: DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, DEPARTMENT OF STATE and others
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ARIZONA and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-2056
Amicus Curiae: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Yet Classified: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Stephen Kolbe v. Lawrence Hogan, Jr.
as 14-1945
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF IOWA, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Defendant / Appellee: BRIAN E. FROSH, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Maryland, WILLIAM M, PALLOZZI, Colonel (pty), Colonel, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Department of State Police and Superintendent of the Maryland State Police, DOUGLAS F. GANSLER, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Maryland and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: WINK'S SPORTING GOODS, INCORPORATED, ASSOCIATED GUN CLUBS OF BALTIMORE, INCORPORATED, ATLANTIC GUNS, INCORPORATED and others
Plaintiff: ANDREW W. TURNER, SHAWN J. TARDY and MATTHEW GODWIN

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?