Cases 31 - 40 of 73
Andrews v. Earl's Restaurants USA Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00817
Defendant:
Earl's Restaurants Ltd and Earl's Restaurants USA Inc.
Plaintiff:
Stephen Andrews
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Robinson v. Pittsfield, Charter Township of et al
as 2:2018cv13290
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bernard Robinson
Defendant:
Nimish Ganatra, Gordon Schick, Allan Thomas Truesdell and others
Underwood v. 1450 SE Orient, LLC et al
as 3:2018cv01366
Defendant:
Denise K. Concannon, Michael R. Munzing, Aligra Marie Rainy and others
Plaintiff:
Laura L. Underwood
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Onemain Financial of Indiana Inc v. Butler
as 2:2018cv00056
Plaintiff:
Onemain Financial of Indiana, Inc
Defendant:
Tiera Butler
Counter_claimant:
Tiera Butler
Counter_defendant:
Onemain Financial of Indiana, Inc , David Tipton , Fred Hecht and others
Cross_defendant:
Andrews and Cox, PC , John Cox , Traci Shuttz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ross v. USA
as 4:2018cv00004
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Stephen Andrew Ross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Okamoto v. Berryhill
as 3:2017cv02347
Plaintiff:
Stephen Andrew Okamoto
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Chavez v. Arnold
as 2:2017cv00077
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Diaz Chavez
Defendant:
Stephen Andrew Arnold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chavez v. Lorensen
as 3:2017cv00069
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Diaz Chavez
Defendant:
Michael D. Lorensen
Consol_defendant:
Edwards, Stephen Andrew Arnold, Gregory Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stephen Hall v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 17-10605
Petitioner - Appellant:
STEPHEN ANDREW HALL
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Robinson v. Andrews et al
as 1:2017cv11557
Plaintiff:
Christopher Robinson
Defendant:
Stephen Andrews, Jim Maudlin, Henry Fusik and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
