Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Jones et al v. Sanks et al
as 4:2017cv00191
Plaintiff:
Roland Jones, Keith Sade, Jason Ellis and others
Defendant:
Jose Morales, Nathan Brooks, Robin Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOLD ALLIANCE et al v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION et al
as 1:2017cv01822
Plaintiff:
BOLD ALLIANCE , BOLD EDUCATION FUND , FRIENDS OF NELSON COUNTY and others
Defendant:
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, NEIL CHATTERJEE, CHERYL A. LAFLEUR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stephen Blackstone v. A. L. Thompson
as 13-4664
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEPHEN BERNARD BLACKSTONE
Defendant - Appellee:
A. L. THOMPSON, SUED IN HIS INIDIVIDUAL AND OFFICIAL CAPACITY
BLACKSTONE v. RICHTER et al
as 2:2012cv01786
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN BERNARD BLACKSTONE
Defendant:
RICHTER, MORRIS, FEATHERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2012cv00789
Petitioner:
Stephen Bernard Jones
Respondent:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BLACKSTONE v. THOMPSON
as 2:2012cv00899
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN BERNARD BLACKSTONE
Defendant:
A. L. THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nunez v. Hamdan et al
as 2:2012cv00188
Plaintiff:
Fernando Nunez
Defendant:
Basam Hamdan , Stephen Bernards and Shane Burton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
T-Mobile Northeast LLC, v. The City of Brockton et al
as 1:2010cv10555
Plaintiff:
T-Mobile Northeast LLC
Defendant:
The City of Brockton, The City of Brockton Zoning Board of Appeals, Anthony Eonas and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 332 (c) Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996
Emery v. Phibro Animal Health Corporation et al
as 4:2007cv00143
Plaintiff:
Dawn Emery and Dawn Emery
Defendant:
Phibro Animal Health Corporation, Prince Agri Products, Inc and Stephen Bernard Gegg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
