Cases 1 - 10 of 15
OSBORN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv21286
Plaintiff:
STEVEN OSBORN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Osborn v. Coffman et al
as 3:2022cv01528
Plaintiff:
Steven Osborn
Defendant:
CEO Coffman and St. Joseph's Drug Rehab
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv01096
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Osborn v. Harris et al
as 9:2020cv00673
Defendant:
Michael Lalonde, Brandon Devins, Mosher and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Osborn and Steve Osborn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03072
Plaintiff:
FRANCISCO AVILA, JACOB ZIMMERMAN, JOSHUA THOMPSON and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Johnson et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02057
Plaintiff:
Francisco Avila, Jacob Zimmerman, Joshua Thompson and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Osborn v. Montgomery
as 18-1639
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Steven Osborn
Defendant - Appellee:
Sergeant Montgomery, Fishkill Correctional Facility S.H.U, Corrections Officer Barksdale, Nurse Shawna Healey and others
Hill v. Stone et al
as 4:2018cv00808
Plaintiff:
Tyrice Hill
Defendant:
Jonathan Stone, Steven Osborn, Matt Burch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Osborne v. Montgomery et al
as 1:2015cv09730
Plaintiff:
Steven Osborne
Defendant:
Montgomery and Barksdale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pickel-Osborn et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv31692
Plaintiff:
Valerie Pickel-Osborn and Steven Osborn
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
