Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Battles v. Southwest Airlines Co.
as 1:2018cv04822
Defendant:
Southwest Airlines Co.
Plaintiff:
Jeff Battles, Lerome Thomas and Steven Spencer
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Holland v. The Brokerage Company et al
as 1:2017cv24728
Plaintiff:
Charles D. Holland
Defendant:
The Brokerage Company, Kyle Anderson, Michael Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Spencer v. Wilson et al
as 4:2017cv01813
Plaintiff:
Steven Spencer
Defendant:
H. Wilson, Deputy Warden Davis, Lee County Correctional Institution Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SSSN LLC v. Mid-America Diesel Incorporated et al
as 2:2015cv00791
Plaintiff:
SSSN LLC
Defendant:
Mid-America Diesel Incorporated and Steven Spencer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nash v. Cook County et al
as 1:2014cv03502
Defendant:
Cook County and Tom Dart
Plaintiff:
Robert Nash
Respondent:
Eva Kurilo, Julian Williams, Howard Paul and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
PANKOWSKI v. MERCHANTS 5 STAR, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv07391
Plaintiff:
EDWARD A. PANKOWSKI
Defendant:
MERCHANTS 5 STAR, INC. , STEVEN SPENCER and JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
DEVINE v. SPENCER et al
as 2:2012cv07390
Defendant:
STEVEN SPENCER , MERCHANTS 5 STAR, INC and JOHN DOES #1 TO #10
Plaintiff:
KRISTEN DEVINE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv01574
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv03490
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Cordell et al v. Sabol et al
as 1:2010cv10879
Plaintiff:
Roger D. Cordell
Defendant:
Carolyn Sabol, Jose Barron, John Seay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
