Cases 1 - 10 of 26
United States of America v. The Real Property And Premises Known As 432 North Oakland Drive, Condominium Unit 103, Beverly Hills, California 90210, And All Proceeds Traceable Thereto
as 24-370
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Claimant:
73DT BUSINESS ENTERPRISES, LLC, 73D BUSINESS BUREAU, INC. and YOSEF MANELA
Defendant:
THE REAL PROPERTY AND PREMISES KNOWN AS 432 NORTH OAKLAND DRIVE, CONDOMINIUM UNIT 103, BEVERLY HILLS, CALIFORNIA 90210, AND ALL PROCEEDS TRACEABLE THERETO, THE REAL PROPERTY AND PREMISES KNOWN AS 432 NORTH OAKLAND DRIVE, CONDOMINIUM UNIT 203, BEVERLY HILLS, CALIFORNIA 90210, AND ALL PROCEEDS TRACEABLE THERETO, ANY AND ALL FUNDS ON DEPOSIT IN STIFEL NICOLAUS & CO. ACCOUNT NUMBER ENDING IN 9142, Held In The Name of 7D Business Bureau Inc., And all Proceeds Traceable Thereto and others
Orji v. Citadel Securities, LLC et al
as 8:2023cv02986
Plaintiff:
Judekenneth Maduka Orji
Defendant:
Citadel Securities, LLC, Goldman Sachs & Co., LLC, GTS Securities, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Dayan-Varnum v. Dayan et al
as 4:2023cv00052
Plaintiff:
Mary Ellen Dayan-Varnum
Defendant:
Kathryn Dayan, Dava Dayan, Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
United States of America v. The Real Property And Premises Known As 432 North Oakhurst Drive, Condominium Unit 103, Beverly Hills, California 90210, And All Proceeds Traceable Thereto et al
as 1:2022cv07410
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
The Real Property And Premises Known As 432 North Oakhurst Drive, Condominium Unit 103, Beverly Hills, California 90210, And All Proceeds Traceable Thereto, The Real Property And Premises Known As 432 North Oakhurst Drive, Condominium Unit 203, Beverly Hills, California 90210, And All Proceeds Traceable Thereto, Any And All Funds On Deposit In Stifel Nicolaus & Co. Account Number Ending In 9142, Held In The Name Of 7D Business Bureau Inc., And All Proceeds Traceable Thereto and others
Claimant:
73DT Business Enterprises, LLC, 7D Business Bureau, Inc. and Yosef Manela
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
New Orleans City et al v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 3:2021cv00147
Defendant:
Mizuho Securities, USA LLC, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Raymond James & Associates, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
New Orleans Aviation Board, New Orleans City, City of New Orleans and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Louisiana Asset Management Pool v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 3:2021cv00003
Defendant:
Raymond James & Associates, Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, BARCLAYS CAPITAL INC. and others
Plaintiff:
Louisiana Asset Management Pool
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
New Orleans City et al v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 2:2020cv02570
Defendant:
SG Americas Securities, LLC, Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and others
Plaintiff:
New Orleans Aviation Board, City of New Orleans, New Orleans Municipal Employees Retirement System and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Louisiana Asset Management Pool v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 2:2020cv01095
Defendant:
SG Americas Securities, LLC, BNP Paribas, RBC Capital Markets, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Louisiana Asset Management Pool, Inc. and Louisiana Asset Management Pool
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Stifel Nicolaus & Co., Inc. v. Stern, et al.
as 1:2020cv00005
Defendant:
Michael Stern, Estate of Gloria Levin, Paul Levin and others
Petitioner:
Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Inc. and Stifel Nicolaus & Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010
State of Louisiana v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
as 3:2019cv00638
Defendant:
J. P. MORGAN SECURITIES LLC, CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS INC., JEFFERIES GROUP LLC and others
Plaintiff:
STATE OF LOUISIANA, by and through its Attorney General, JEFF LANDRY and State Of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
