Cases 1 - 10 of 646
NICHOLS v. STREETER et al
as 5:2024cv00265
Defendant:
PAYNE, STREETER and FISHER
Plaintiff:
TAFT NICHOLS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ray v. Woodfin et al
as 5:2024cv01601
Defendant:
Phillip Mitchell, George Adams, Richards and others
Plaintiff:
Melvin Ray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Streeter v. United States of America
as 8:2024cv02661
Plaintiff:
Michaelle Aminah Streeter
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364 Auto Negligence
Randall Hebert et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 1:2024cv08663
Plaintiff:
Willam Beech, Glen Welch, Arthur Green and others
Defendant:
The 3M Company f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00565
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Green v. Streeter et al
as 5:2024cv01501
Petitioner:
Jason Dewane Green
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The and William Streeter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MURPHY et al v. KOHL'S INC.
as 2:2024cv05569
Plaintiff:
BRANDY MURPHY, ROBIN WELLS, LISA STREETER and others
Defendant:
KOHL'S INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Aimee Streeter v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 24-13367
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Petitioner:
AIMEE D. STREETER
Reavis v. Darden et al
as 5:2024ct03257
Defendant:
C/O Sadler, C/O William, Ms. Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Brian A. Reavis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Marshall et al
as 5:2024cv01393
Defendant:
J Treadway, Steve Marshall, Denise McKenzie and others
Plaintiff:
Martin Ray Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
