Cases 11 - 20 of 57
Mays v. State of North Carolina
as 3:2020cv00087
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Petitioner:
Richard T. Mays
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mays v. Executive Director of Colorado Department of Corrections
as 1:2019cv03323
Petitioner:
James T. Mays
Respondent:
Executive Director of Colorado Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv02166
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
May v. USA
as 7:2018cv00087
Petitioner:
Russell T May
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. P.M. Custom Cycles, L.L.C. et al
as 8:2018cv00516
Plaintiff:
Broadcast Music, Inc. , Harrick Music, Inc. , EMI Consortium Songs, Inc. and others
Defendant:
P.M. Custom Cycles, L.L.C., Minh T. Mai and Lori A. Mai
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Mai v. United States et al
as 2:2017cv00561
Plaintiff:
Duy T Mai
Defendant:
United States, Department of Justice, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
May v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2017cv02141
Plaintiff:
James T May
Defendant:
Janssen Ortho LLC, Johnson & Johnson Company, Bayer Pharma AG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thoa Nguyen, et al v. LA State Board of Cosmetology
as 16-31264
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOA T. NGUYEN, HIEN HOANG, NGUYEN T. MAI and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CELIA CANGELOSI
Hall v. May et al
as 3:2016cv00960
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Lee Hall
Defendant:
T. May, Broaduss and Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HATCH et al v. DEMAYO et al
as 1:2016cv00925
Plaintiff:
JOHNATHAN HATCH , SHATERIKA NICHOLSON and Mark Dvorsky
Defendant:
MICHAEL A. DEMAYO , THE LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL A. DEMAYO, P.C. , LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL A. DEMAYO, L.L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
