Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 21
MORRIS et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2023cv01941
Plaintiff: MICHAEL A. MORRIS, JESSE URENA, BRIANNE CROOKS and others
Defendant: ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
Mullins v. Singleton Clark et al
as 8:2023cv00481
Plaintiff: Tereance Mullins
Defendant: April T Singleton Clark, Lindon Leach, Halford Meyer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Banks v. Singleton We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00005
Plaintiff: Albert Banks, Jr.
Defendant: T Singleton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Baldwin et al
as 3:2019cv03264
Defendant: Kess Roberson, John Baldwin, Patrick T. Singleton and others
Plaintiff: Howard W Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Baldwin et al
as 3:2019cv01269
Defendant: Kess Roberson, John Baldwin, Patrick T. Singleton and others
Plaintiff: Howard W. Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dennis v. Davis et al
as 4:2019cv04147
Defendant: R Davis, Leonta Jackson, . Gresham and others
Plaintiff: Roy C Dennis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Baldwin et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv00732
Defendant: Connie Houston, Kess Roberson, Koontz and others
Plaintiff: Howard W. Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Danneman v. Roberson et al
as 3:2019cv03115
Defendant: Kess Roberson, Sandra Funk, T Singleton and others
Plaintiff: Benjamin David Danneman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parshall v. First South Bancorp, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv00124
Plaintiff: Paul Parshall
Defendant: First South Bancorp, Inc., Frederick N. Holscher, Marshall T. Singleton and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
In re: Gary Singleton
as 15-15233
Petitioner: In re: GARY T. SINGLETON
Successive Habeas Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF ALABAMA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?