Cases 11 - 20 of 52
Carroll v. Bank of America, N.A.
as 2:2019cv00146
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Geraldine T. Carroll
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Carroll v. Bank of America, N.A.
as 1:2019cv00556
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Geraldine T. Carroll
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Carroll v. Oklahoma City City of
as 5:2019cv00433
Plaintiff:
Arlon T Carroll
Defendant:
Oklahoma City City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DEDRICK et al v. BANET
as 4:2018cv00183
Plaintiff:
WESLEY D. STOCKTON, TOBIAS JONES, RAYMOND CARR, JR. and others
Defendant:
BANET
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carroll v. California, State of et al
as 3:2017cv01922
Plaintiff:
T. Carroll
Defendant:
California, State of, Paramo, . and Scott Kernan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Biggins v. Carl Danberg, et al
as 17-2319
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant:
CARL C. DANBERG, T. CARROLL, R. KEARNEY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
RONALD WILLEY, R. CARTER, E. HEDDINGER and others
Carroll v. Beaver Creek Coal Company, et al
as 17-9505
Petitioner:
JAMES T. CARROLL
Respondent:
DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and BEAVER CREEK COAL COMPANY
United States of America v. Barclays Capital, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv07057
Defendant:
BCAP LLC, Barclays Bank PLC, Barclays Capital, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 USA Plaintiff
Kailey v. Jefferson County, Colorado, Sheriff's Office
as 1:2016cv01631
Plaintiff:
Randy Kailey
Defendant:
Jefferson County, Colorado, Sheriff's Office, Thodore (I) Mink, Thodore Mink and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Donohue v. J. Lambert
as 16-6628
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN PATRICK DONOHUE
Defendant - Appellee:
LT. J. LAMBERT, LT. MCCOWAN, LT. LIEUTENANT PAYNE and others
Defendant:
LT. SERGEANT BLEVENS, WARDEN RANDALL C. MATHENA, C/O OFFICER BEVERLY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
