Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01155
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01154
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Lawrence Stackhouse v. Brian Allo
as 2:2026cv05901
Petitioner:
Lawrence Stackhouse
Respondent:
Brian Allo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
STACKHOUSE v. BISIGNANO
as 1:2026cv01144
Plaintiff:
TAMMRA JILL STACKHOUSE
Defendant:
FRANK BISIGNANO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Spriggs v. Savor et al
as 2:2026cv00299
Plaintiff:
Demontre Spriggs
Defendant:
Savor, Eddy, Rodregez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Spriggs v. Savor et al
as 5:2026cv00089
Plaintiff:
Demontre Spriggs
Defendant:
Savor, Eddy, Rodregez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mallon v. Department of Children and Families et al
as 2:2026cv14102
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey W. Mallon
Defendant:
Department of Children and Families, Vinny Russo, Bolin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES et al v. JONES ESTATES LLC et al
as 2:2026cv00238
Plaintiff:
ANNA CHRISTINE JONES, DAVID KIHN, RANDY KOENIG and others
Defendant:
JONES ESTATES LLC, STACKHOUSE MANAGEMENT LLC and Stackhouse Properties LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other
Stackhouse v. Bisignano
as 1:2026cv00086
Plaintiff:
Milsha L Stackhouse
Defendant:
Frank J Bisignano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Stackhouse v. Turman et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2025cv00962
Plaintiff:
Billy Ray Stackhouse
Defendant:
Blake Turman, Jennifer Hudson, Phillip Osborne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
