Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Murray v. Carnival Corporation
as 1:2019cv23939
Plaintiff:
Thomas Terrence Murray
Defendant:
Carnival Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hickman v. Murray, et al
as 2:2019cv11711
Not Yet Classified:
Uber Technologies Inc., ABC Insurance Company and Progressive Ins Co
Defendant:
Thomas J Murray, Jr., Rasier, LLC, Progressive Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
Tracy Hickman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas J. Murray & Associates, LLC v. Bailey & Glasser, LLP
as 3:2018cv01991
Defendant:
Bailey & Glasser, LLP
Plaintiff:
Thomas J. Murray & Associates, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Murray v. Brevard County Jail et al
as 6:2018cv00909
Plaintiff:
Thomas Leo Murray
Defendant:
Brevard County Jail, Mrs. Haman and Officer Fayson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murray et al v. Ainsworth et al
as 1:2016cv00037
Plaintiff:
Thomas D. Murray and Theresa D. Murray
Defendant:
Harold B. Ainsworth , Opal B. Ainsworth , Loreeda L. Strickland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
ROBINSON v. CITY OF QUINCY FLORIDA et al
as 4:2015cv00039
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY LEE ROBINSON
Defendant:
CITY OF QUINCY FLORIDA and THOMAS L MURRAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murray v. Cheatham County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2014cv01414
Plaintiff:
Thomas T. Murray
Defendant:
Cheatham County, Tennessee , John Holder , John/Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Thomas A. Murray v. Accomack County Health Dept
as 14-1134
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS A. MURRAY
Defendant - Appellee:
ACCOMACK COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT, Director
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Murray v. Accomac County Health Department et al
as 2:2013cv00206
Plaintiff:
Thomas A. Murray
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Medical Malpractice
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv06444
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
