Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Peaster v. Clean Harbors Environmental Services Inc.
as 1:2026cv02030
Plaintiff:
Thomas Lee Peaster
Defendant:
Clean Harbors Environmental Services Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Dinkins v. United States of America et al
as 3:2026cv00726
Plaintiff:
MAKAYLA JOY DINKINS
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Postal Service and THOMAS LEE BROWN, SR.
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Thomas Farmer v. US
as 26-6348
Plaintiff:
THOMAS LEE FARMER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, WARDEN R. BROWN, Federal Correctional Institution Gilmer (FCI-Gilmer) and others
CANTY v. MIMS
as 5:2026cv00109
Petitioner:
THOMAS LEE CANTY, JR
Respondent:
BRIAN MIMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clelland v. Crawford County, Kansas, et al
as 25-3221
Plaintiff:
THOMAS LEE CLELLAND
Defendant:
CRAWFORD COUNTY, KANSAS, BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS CRAWFORD COUNTY, KANSAS, TOM MOODY and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv00452
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee
MARSHALL v. MARSHALL (COOPER)
as 1:2025cv02444
Plaintiff:
THOMAS LEE MARSHALL, JR.
Defendant:
MARYJANE MARSHALL (COOPER)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Labarge et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2025cv13344
Defendant:
3M Company, Carrier Fire & Security Americas LLC, Carrier Fire & Security Corporation LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Scott Labarge, Franklin Ladaga, Cooper Ladnier and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 a1 Federal Officer Removal
MARSHALL v. MARION COUNTY, INDIANA et al
as 1:2025cv02241
Plaintiff:
THOMAS LEE MARSHALL, JR.
Defendant:
MARION COUNTY, INDIANA, UNKNOWN JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATORS and JOHN/JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
