Cases 1 - 10 of 12
United States of America v. Garcia
as 5:2023cv00108
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Timothy Garcia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651 Occupational Safety/Health
Sanchez Gallegos v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2023cv00112
Plaintiff:
Gloria Sanchez Gallegos
Defendant:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Jasen Tapia, Raymond Romero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
GARCIA v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv20707
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY GARCIA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Whitehead v. Garcia et al
as 1:2020cv01087
Plaintiff:
Clayton Whitehead and Clayton Wade Whitehead
Defendant:
Otero County Detention Center and Timothy Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. Savage et al
as 9:2018cv00067
Plaintiff:
Alliance for the Wild Rockies
Defendant:
Chris Savage , Leanne Marten , United States Forest Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4332
Garcia v. Eppinger
as 1:2017cv01090
Petitioner:
Timothy Garcia
Respondent:
LaShaunn Eppinger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Garcia v. Colvin
as 1:2016cv02311
Plaintiff:
Timothy Garcia
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Interested_party:
SSA Noticing and USAO-SS-Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Sharp, et al v. CGG Land (U.S.)
as 15-5113
Plaintiff / Appellant:
R. DANE SHARP, individually and on behalf of all similarly situated employees, ALEJANDRO ESPINOZA, MARIANO ESPINOZA, JR. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CGG LAND (U.S.) INC.
Sharp, et al v. CGG Land (U.S.)
as 15-5113
Plaintiff - Appellant:
R. DANE SHARP, individually and on behalf of all similarly situated employees, ALEJANDRO ESPINOZA, MARIANO ESPINOZA, JR. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CGG LAND (U.S.) INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
