Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Perez v. Daniels et al
as 2:2023cv01110
Plaintiff:
Joseph Perez
Defendant:
Charles Daniels, Calvin Johnson, Michael Minev and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGee v. Avril et al
as 1:2022cv04960
Plaintiff:
Tony McGee
Defendant:
John Avril and Glen Grays
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
McGee v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv03928
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Tony McGee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00677
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Gaxiola v. American Medical Systems, Inc., et al
as 3:2017cv01250
Plaintiff:
Claudia Gaxiola , Velora Abel , Theresa Allen-Cohen and others
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. , American Medical Systems, LLC , Astora Women's Health LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
McGee v. McGready et al
as 1:2016cv04187
Plaintiff:
Tony McGee
Defendant:
McGready, A. Black, Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGee v. Haight
as 13-4296
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Tony McGee
Defendant - Appellee:
Haight, Correction Officer; Coxsackie Correctional Facility, Bussast, or "Bussab"; Correction Officer; Coxsackie Correctional Facility, McMacllean and others
McGee et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv27685
Plaintiff:
Toni McGee and Chris McGee
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McGee v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2013cv05816
Defendant:
Chief Police Edward Baca, Chief Police Edward Baca, County of Los Angeles and others
#531010:
Deputy Bowman
Plaintiff:
Tony McGee
McGee v. Capra
as 1:2013cv03232
Petitioner:
Tony McGee
Respondent:
Michael Mr. Capra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
