Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Anderson v. Revlon, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv08449
Plaintiff:
Tonya Anderson
Defendant:
Revlon, Inc., Revlon Consumer Products Corporation, Revlon Group Holdings LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1400
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Murshid v. Sollie
as 22-60534
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Abdulkhalig Mohamed Murshid
Defendant / Appellee:
Billie Sollie, Lauderdale County Sheriff Department, Major Melissa McCarter, Conchetitta Chaney and others
TAYLOR et al v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
as 2:2022cv03676
Plaintiff:
RHONDA TAYLOR and TONYA ANDERSON
Defendant:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. and UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. INDIVIDUALLY AND doing business as UPS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 185 Suit to Compel Arbitration
TAYLOR et al v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
as 2:2022cv03670
Plaintiff:
RHONDA TAYLOR and TONYA ANDERSON
Defendant:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 27 U.S.C. § 185 Enforcement of Arbitration Award
TAYLOR et al
as 2:2022cv03668
Plaintiff:
RHONDA TAYLOR and TONYA ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 185 Suit to Compel Arbitration
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00778
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Nelson v. Sollie et al
as 3:2019cv00796
Defendant:
Medical Staff of LCDF, Billy Sollie, Melissa McCarter and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Jarrett Romero Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fikes v. Sollie et al
as 3:2019cv00755
Defendant:
Tonya Anderson, Billy Sollie and Lauderdale County, Mississippi
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Ladarron Lashon Fikes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANDERSON v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2016cv06204
Plaintiff:
TONYA ANDERSON
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
