Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Randolph v. Collins et al
as 2:2026cv04481
Plaintiff:
Jordan Randolph
Defendant:
John B Collins, John J Toomey, Jennifer A Henry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Jacqueline Ouimette-Toomey v. Lemko Transport et al
as 5:2026cv00415
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Ouimette-Toomey
Defendant:
Lemko Transport and Michael Darinski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Davis v. City of Worcester et al
as 4:2026cv40130
Plaintiff:
Gordon T. Davis
Defendant:
City of Worcester, Kathleen M. Toomey, Eric D. Batista and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv03018
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv03018
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-700
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Toomey v. Becton Dickinson and Company et al
as 2:2026cv01684
Plaintiff:
Theresa I Toomey
Defendant:
Becton Dickinson and Company, C R Bard Incorporated, Bard Access Systems Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SULLIVAN v. OLIVER et al
as 5:2026cv00043
Plaintiff:
MARIO ROMOAN SULLIVAN
Defendant:
TYRONE OLIVER, WARDEN MICHAEL THOMAS, CHARLES MIMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marlowe v. Guzman, et al
as 26-1166
Plaintiff:
KEVIN D. MARLOWE
Defendant:
ISABELLA CASILLAS GUZMAN, SBA Administrator, LTG ROBERT SKINNER, USAF Disa Director and PAT TOOMEY
Abashian et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2026cv00100
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Inc., Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Peter Abashian, Robert Allen, Warren Ayler, Sr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
