Cases 11 - 20 of 68
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00857
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Shafer et al v. Rutledge et al
as 2:2021cv00040
Plaintiff:
Thomas Twiss and Richard Scott Shafer
Defendant:
Lt. Garza, Michael Rutledge, Captain Christi L. Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jacob v. Cotton et al
as 4:2020cv03107
Defendant:
Virgil J. Patlan, Layne Gissler, Mark T. Langan and others
Plaintiff:
David H. Jacob
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carper v. State of Nebraska et al
as 8:2019cv00404
Plaintiff:
Julie Lynn Carper
Defendant:
Hon. CJ Heavican, Nebraska Attorney General, Hon. Twiss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Twiss v. Northstar Realty Europe Corp. et al
as 1:2019cv02563
Defendant:
Dianne Hurley, Richard Brett Saltzman, Mahbod Nia and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Twiss
Tyrrell v. Cotton et al
as 8:2019cv00386
Defendant:
Teresa Bittinger, Layne Gissler, Bob Twiss and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Tyrrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Snap Shot Roofing and Gutters, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv01093
Defendant:
Snap Shot Roofing and Gutters, LLC and Jimmy Lee Twiss
Plaintiff:
David White
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
White v. Snap Shot Roofing and Gutters, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv01094
Defendant:
Snap Shot Roofing and Gutters, LLC and Jimmy Lee Twiss
Plaintiff:
David White
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Fitzsimmons v. Freeman Health System et al
as 3:2019cv05009
Plaintiff:
Dolores Fitzsimmons
Defendant:
Freeman Health System, Freeman Health System d/b/a Freeman Health System Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine and Todd Twiss, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402
IMO 2018 Attorney Mass Suspension
as 1:2018mc00026
In Re:
Lauren Kathleen Griffin, Michael John Bellich, Thomas William Belleperche and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
