Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Collins v. Greater Cincinnati Behavorial Health Services
as 1:2023cv00578
Plaintiff:
Tammy Collins
Defendant:
Greater Cincinnati Behavorial Health Services
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Collins v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01924
Plaintiff:
Tammy Collins
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv06467
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv07887
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Floyd v. Clayton et al
as 4:2017cv04002
Plaintiff:
Sebron Floyd
Defendant:
James C Clayton, Forest Ashby, Dave Biermann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Collins v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2016cv07484
Plaintiff:
Tammy Collins
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alford et al v. Eagle U S 2 L L C et al
as 2:2015cv00676
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Alford , Barbara Lee Bennett , Tammy Booker and others
Defendant:
Eagle U S 2 L L C and David L Ardoin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Corey Thompson v. Johnny Dukes, et al
as 11-11170
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COREY THOMPSON
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHNNY DUKES, RICHARD WALDEN, SCOTTY G. CRAIGHEAD and others
BETANCOURT et al v. ESTATE OF JOLENE M. DONELAN et al
as 1:2009cv03595
Plaintiff:
MARIA BETANCOURT and TAMMY COLLINS BEAVER
Defendant:
ESTATE OF JOLENE M. DONELAN, JAMES A. PAULING and GREYHOUND LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Burl v. Dotson et al
as 1:2009cv01086
Plaintiff:
Miko T. Burl
Defendant:
Stephen Dotson, Grady Perry, Tammy Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
