Cases 1 - 10 of 1,890
United States of America v. Tatum
as 25-2872
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MICHAEL TATUM
BELL et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2025cv03690
Defendant:
LLT MANAGEMENT LLC, JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER and others
Unknown:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
TATUM BELL and THE ESTATE OF DECEDENT DONNA GARDNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Namiotka v. Barra et al
as 2:2025cv11211
Plaintiff:
Lee Namiotka
Defendant:
Mary T. Barra, Paul A. Jacobson, Wesley G. Bush and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Tatum et al v. Kinzie Advanced Polymers
as 1:2025cv01321
Plaintiff:
Michael Ryan Tatum and Calyx Containers LLC
Defendant:
Kinzie Advanced Polymers LLC d/b/a Grove Bags
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Tatum v. Hoy et al
as 2:2025cv00583
Plaintiff:
Robert L Tatum
Defendant:
Jared Hoy, Christopher Stevens, Connor Lemke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Toney v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2025cv03370
Plaintiff:
Tatum Peniston Toney
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Social Security Administrative Record and US Attorney - Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Tatum v. LOreal USA, Inc., et al
as 1:2025cv04328
Defendant:
Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC, DUDLEY BEAUTY CORP., LLC, LOreal USA, Inc., and others
Plaintiff:
Celestine L. Tatum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Mecom v. Southwest Virginia Regional Jail et al
as 7:2025cv00244
Plaintiff:
Alyssa Mecom
Defendant:
Southwest Virginia Regional Jail, Captain Tatum and Major Killgore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
