Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Tatum v. Bay Street Lending, LLC et al
as 6:2026cv00349
Plaintiff:
Justin Tatum
Defendant:
Bay Street Lending, LLC and Richard Billi
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Wiley (PS) v. U.S. Dept. of the Treasury et al
as 1:2026cv03179
Plaintiff:
Sherry Ann Wiley
Defendant:
U.S. Dept. of the Treasury, Scott Bessent, Francis Brook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tatum v. Lexington Capital Holdings LLC
as 6:2026cv00338
Plaintiff:
Justin Tatum
Defendant:
Lexington Capital Holdings LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Tatum v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company et al
as 6:2026cv00339
Plaintiff:
Justin Tatum
Defendant:
Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company and United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Collins v. Alsbrook et al
as 7:2026cv00550
Plaintiff:
Aaron R. Collins
Defendant:
Colonel Rick Alsbrook, Major Todd Tatum, Lt. Montgomery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TATUM v. ANGELES et al
as 2:2026cv00455
Plaintiff:
TREMAINE TATUM
Defendant:
ANGELES, HANCOCK, MOOREHEAD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Tatum
as 26-1755
Plaintiff:
DEMETRIUS HILL, Demetrius Capone and Meechie Hill
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Staff Attorney LES OWENS, Supervisory Attorney, NORMAN REID, Unit Manager, KENNETH BORK, Staff Attorney and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02098
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans with Disabilities-Public Accommodations
Tatum v. Becton Dickinson and Company et al
as 2:2026cv04460
Plaintiff:
Chris Wayne Tatum
Defendant:
Becton Dickinson and Company, C R Bard Incorporated, Bard Access Systems Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
