Cases 1 - 10 of 13
United States of America v. Olivo (Sanchez)
as 24-2151
Defendant:
ELIMANUEL DIAZ, PEDRO OLIVO, WILLIE TUCKER and others
:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Olivo (Martinez)
as 24-1699
Defendant:
PEDRO OLIVO, JOAQUIN CASTILLO, MICHAEL MARTINEZ and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Armstrong v. Rentals et al
as 3:2023cv04707
Plaintiff:
Clyde Armstrong
Defendant:
Mark Rentals, Predo Rodrigous, Carline Rodrigous and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
LANGSTON v. WARDEN
as 2:2023cv00215
Petitioner:
TAZZ LANGSTON
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Armstrong v. Rentels et al
as 3:2022cv04525
Plaintiff:
Clyde Armstrong
Defendant:
Mark Rentels, Predo Rodrgous, Mark Rodrgous and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Trystar, LLC v. Tazz-CPC, Inc. et al
as 0:2022cv01465
Plaintiff:
Trystar, LLC
Defendant:
Tazz-CPC, Inc., Christian E Tazzia and Christian E. Tazzia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
United States of America v. Olivo (Clase)
as 21-874
Defendant:
Carlos Acosta, Wayne Scott, Jesus Mata and others
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Anthony Clase
Tacitus Hall v. Timothy Anderson
as 20-1786
Defendant / Appellee:
NATIONAL SERVICING CENTER, FORD MANUFACTURER, KEITH MICHAEL YACKO and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TACITUS ANASTACIUS HALL, a/k/a Tazz Hall
United States of America v. Olivo (Edwin Romero)
as 19-4053
Defendant:
Carlos Acosta, Wayne Scott, Jesus Mata and others
Not Yet Classified:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Edwin Romero
United States of America v. Olivo (Anibal Gonzalez)
as 19-3684
Defendant:
Carlos Acosta, Wayne Scott, Jesus Mata and others
Not Yet Classified:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Anibal Gonzalez
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
