Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Kansas, State of et al v. United States Attorney General et al
as 2:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Kansas, State of, Arkansas, State of, Iowa, State of and others
Defendant:
United States Attorney General, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and United States Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Tennessee, State of et al v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
as 2:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
Tennessee, State of, Arkansas, State of, Alabama, State of and others
Defendant:
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
United States of America v. Agri Stats, Inc.
as 0:2023cv03009
Plaintiff:
United States of America, California, State of, North Carolina, State of and others
Defendant:
Agri Stats, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Indiana, State of et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2023cv00106
Plaintiff:
Indiana, State of, North Dakota, State of, Alaska, State of and others
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Troy A. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Arizona, State of et al v. Michael D Lansky LLC et al
as 4:2023cv00233
Plaintiff:
Arizona, State of, Alabama, State of, Arkansas, State of and others
Defendant:
Michael D Lansky LLC an Arizona limited liability company doing business as Avid Telecom, Michael D Lansky individually as a Member/Manager/Chief Executive Officer of Michael D Lansky LLC doing business as Avid Telecom and Stacy S Reeves individually as a Manager/Vice President of Michael D Lansky LLC doing business as Avid Telecom
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
In re: William Lee, et al
as 23-502
Petitioner:
In re: WILLIAM BYRON LEE, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Tennessee, MARK GOINS, in his official capacity as Coordinator of Elections for the State of Tennessee, TRE HARGETT, in his official capacity as Secretary of the State of Tennessee and others
Respondent:
TENNESSEE STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP, on behalf of itself and its members, LAMAR PERRY, CURTIS GRAY, JR. and others
West Virginia, State of et al v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency et al
as 3:2023cv00032
Plaintiff:
West Virginia, State of, North Dakota, State of, Georgia, State of and others
Defendant:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Michael S. Regan, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Chickaloon Village Traditional Council, Rappahannock Tribe, Tohono O'Odham Nation and others
Intervenor:
American Farm Bureau Federation, American Petroleum Institute, American Road and Transportation Builders Association and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Firearms Regulatory Accountability Coalition, Inc. et al v. Garland et al
as 1:2023cv00024
Plaintiff:
Firearms Regulatory Accountability Coalition, Inc., West Virginia, State of, North Dakota, State of and others
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, The and Steven Dettelbach
Petitioner:
Members of Congress
Amicus Curiae:
Robert M. Miller, Ph.D.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
TN St Conference of the NAACP, et al v. Tre Hargett, et al
as 21-6024
Plaintiff / Appellee:
THE TENNESSEE STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP, DEMOCRACY NASHVILLE-DEMOCRATIC COMMUNITIES, THE EQUITY ALLIANCE and others
Defendant / Appellant:
TRE HARGETT, in his official capacity as Secretary of State of Tennessee, MARK GOINS, in his official capacity as Coordinator of Elections for the State of Tennessee, TENNESSEE STATE ELECTION COMMISSION and others
Garfield v. Middle Tennessee State University et al
as 3:2021cv00613
Petitioner:
Avery Garfield
Respondent:
Middle Tennessee State University and Dr. Jenny Sauls
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
