Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Coleman v. City of Chicago, The et al
as 1:2013cv04434
Plaintiff:
Terry Coleman
Defendant:
City of Chicago, The and John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
COLEMAN v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as PAE/2:12-cv-01749
Plaintiff:
TERRI COLEMAN
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION and JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 3
COLEMAN v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as 2:2012cv01749
Plaintiff:
TERRI COLEMAN
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION and JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Akines et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv00612
Plaintiff:
Brenda Akines, Regina Banks, Lesslie Bishop and others
Defendant:
John Does 1 through 3 and SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
LaRue v. Coleman et al
as 2:2011cv00072
Plaintiff:
William A. LaRue
Defendant:
Terry Coleman , Christopher Hess , David Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Caudill et al
as 2:2011cv00103
Plaintiff:
Andre' Wilson
Defendant:
Steve Caudill , Terry Coleman , David Ballard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Persinger v. Roberts et al
as 2:2009cv00825
Plaintiff:
Roger Persinger
Defendant:
Naomi Roberts, Doctor Subosh, Doctor Gajendragakar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COLEMAN v. AQUA-CHEM INC et al
as 2:2008cv89203
Plaintiff:
TERRY COLEMAN
Defendant:
AQUA-CHEM INC, BORG-WARNER MORSE TEC INC, CERTAINTEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Coleman v. Aqua-Chem Inc et al
as 0:2008cv02744
Plaintiff:
Terry Coleman
Defendant:
Aqua-Chem Inc, Borg Warner Morse TEC Inc, Certainteed Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Lowe v. Campbell et al
as 1:2007cv00012
Plaintiff:
Leo Rogers Lowe
Defendant:
Troy Campbell, Patrick Miller, Terry Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
