Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Pearson et al v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2024pq00601
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Terry Pearson and Wanda Pearson
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC and Does 1 through 60 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pearson v. Mobley et al
as 3:2021cv00012
Plaintiff:
Terri Pearson
Defendant:
Justin Mobley, Janet Moon, City of Peachtree City and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Terry Pearson v. Myron Woodson, et al
as 19-1015
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Terry Pearson
Defendant / Appellee:
Myron Woodson, COI #132140 and Brice Simmons, in his individual capacity
Pearson v. Woodson et al
as 4:2018cv00522
Plaintiff:
Terry Pearson
Defendant:
Myron Woodson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pearson v. Porlier et al
as 9:2015cv01427
Plaintiff:
Terry Pearson
Defendant:
Dan Porlier, Mike Brockley, Sergeant Scarletto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pearson et al v. Howmedica Osteonics et al
as 0:2014cv04518
Plaintiff:
Judy T. Pearson and Terry Pearson
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics, Stryker Corp., Stryker Sales Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pearson et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv16815
Plaintiff:
Rachel Pearson and Terry Pearson
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pearson et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv10144
Plaintiff:
Jerri Pearson and Terry Pearson
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv01064
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Pearson v. New York City et al
as 1:2008cv07088
Plaintiff:
Terry Pearson
Defendant:
New York City, Singletary and Unidentified New York City Department of Corrections Officers From C-74. (RNDC)
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
