Cases 21 - 30 of 1,542
Plater v. Topping, et al
as 23-6217
Plaintiff:
RAHEEM LA'MONZE PLATER
Defendant:
CHRISTINE TOPPING, (FNU) ROWLEY, GEO GROUP, INC. and others
Hatcher v. Lovejoy Correctional Facility
as 2:2023cv01735
Plaintiff:
Jamarcus Dewayne Hatcher
Defendant:
Lovejoy Correctional Facility, Robert A. Deyton Detention Facility and Geo Group Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roybal v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01094
Plaintiff:
Greg Roybal
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Aiste Chamblin, Chirag Acharya and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lloyd-Zeeryp v. The GEO Group, Inc.
as 1:2023cv01282
Plaintiff:
Paige Lloyd-Zeeryp
Defendant:
The GEO Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Poindexter v. GEO Group Inc et al
as 5:2023cv01063
Plaintiff:
Jim Poindexter
Defendant:
GEO Group Inc, Timms FNU and Nurse Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MILLER v. CYBORSKI et al
as 1:2023cv02078
Plaintiff:
ARTHULA MILLER
Defendant:
D. CYBORSKI and GEO GROUP INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MASSAQUOI v. ODDO et al
as 3:2023cv00280
Plaintiff:
MANNA MASSAQUOI
Defendant:
LEONARD J. ODDO, C. Glass, Vicki Vaux and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Gray v. GEO Group Inc et al
as 5:2023cv01023
Plaintiff:
Linda Gray
Defendant:
GEO Group Inc, Michael Boger, Kristine Kusner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00293
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Juan Hernandez v. GEO Group Inc., et al
as 23-13653
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JUAN HERNANDEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
GEO GROUP INC., FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CENTURION LLC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
