Cases 1 - 10 of 1,358
Watkins v. Chau, et al
as 1:2024cv11328
Plaintiff:
Ida Watkins
Defendant:
Stephanie Chau, Christopher Norris, Kevin Collins and others
Harris v. Metro Transit Police Dept et al
as 0:2024cv01791
Plaintiff:
Joshua Harris
Defendant:
Metro Transit Police Dept, Nelson and Vang
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robinson v. Cyber Space LTD Industry et al
as 2:2024cv00322
Plaintiff:
Vickie Lynn Robinson
Defendant:
Cyber Space LTD Industry, Virginia Internet Providers, Dollar General and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Trabue v. Louisville-Jefferson County Metro Government et al
as 3:2024cv00277
Plaintiff:
Chaprecious Trabue
Defendant:
Louisville-Jefferson County Metro Government, Officer Juan Ochoa, Officer Saja Salman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Francis Keister, Jr. v. Metro Nashville Police Department, et al
as 24-5442
Plaintiff:
FRANCIS KEISTER, JR.
Defendant:
METRO NASHVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, DAVIDSON COUNTY, TN SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, T. PARSON, Officer and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1398
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Howard v. TBI et al
as 3:2024cv00548
Plaintiff:
William Howard
Defendant:
TBI, FSP Nashville, Chelsea M. Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00319
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00574
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00580
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
