Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1009
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Justin Sutton v. Rockingham County
as 23-2262
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JUSTIN L. SUTTON, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Hartwell Lanier King, Sr., BETTY K. SUTTON, Individually and JUSTIN LANIER SUTTON, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Hartwell Lanier King, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee:
ROCKINGHAM COUNTY, THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY, TAYLOR CARTER, Individually and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00205
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv02397
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01846
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
SUTTON, et al v. ROCKINGHAM COUNTY et al
as 1:2021cv00095
Defendant:
TAYLOR CARTER, PAUL HIGGINS, UNNAMED ROCKINGHAM COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPUTY and others
Plaintiff:
BETTY K SUTTON and JUSTIN L. SUTTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv07896
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Valley Green Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Company
as 2:2019cv07504
Defendant:
Travelers Indemnity Company, -, The Travelers Indemnity Company and Does 1-25, Inclusive
Plaintiff:
Valley Green Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02101
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv01065
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
