Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Porter v. Lemire et al
as 2:2024cv00504
Plaintiff:
Tomarcus Porter
Defendant:
Caleb Lemire, Dustin Luper, Thomas Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walter Moffett v. Michael Dittman, et al
as 23-2985
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WALTER J.D. MOFFETT
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL DITTMAN, BRANDON BORTZ, RUSSELL GOLDSMITH and others
Stutts v. Williams et al
as 8:2022cv03923
Petitioner:
Thomas Mitchell Stutts
Respondent:
Warden Williams, Perry Correctional Inst, SCDC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00342
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00317
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Minish v. Terrell et al
as 2:2021cv00018
Plaintiff:
Thomas Mitchell Minish
Defendant:
Jail Administration, Habersham County Detention Center and Sheriff Joey Terrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Minish v. Mangus et al
as 2:2021cv00017
Plaintiff:
Thomas Mitchell Minish
Defendant:
Jail Administration of Jackson County Jail and Sheriff Jannis Mangus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baldwin v. Foster et al
as 5:2020cv05017
Defendant:
Corporal Will Foster and Corporal Thomas Mitchell
Plaintiff:
Dustin Joel Jay Baldwin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor, George v. Litscher, Jon et al
as 3:2019cv00363
Defendant:
Thomas Mitchell, Jon Litscher, Michael Stephens and others
Plaintiff:
George Taylor
Not Yet Classified:
CCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stuck v. United States of America
as 2:2019cv00262
Petitioner:
Thomas Mitchell Stuck
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
