Cases 21 - 30 of 353
Tillery v. Revlon, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv08884
Plaintiff:
Eula Tillery
Defendant:
Revlon, Inc., Revlon Consumer Products Corporation and Revlon Group Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SHANK et al v. PARRISH
as 2:2023cv02769
Plaintiff:
KEITH SHANK and RAYMOND TILLERY
Defendant:
MARK PARRISH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Tillery v. Spinelli
as 8:2023cv01303
Plaintiff:
Kenneth R. Tillery
Defendant:
K. Spinelli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tillery v. Streeval
as 7:2023cv00349
Petitioner:
Carter Tillery
Respondent:
Warden Streeval
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Tillery v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2023cv00398
Petitioner:
Steven Troy Tillery
Respondent:
Warden, Estelle Unit Michael Britt and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tillery v. Turman et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00257
Plaintiff:
James Tillery
Defendant:
Blake Turman, Thomas Hugghins and Vikki Boyett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foster v. Thompson et al
as 2:2023cv00661
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Dewayne Foster
Defendant:
Brent Thompson, Jessie Bellamy, Krystle Simon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tillery v. McMillan et al
as 8:2023cv01151
Plaintiff:
Kenneth R. Tillery
Defendant:
James McMillan and Ken Lyons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holder v. Cooley et al
as 2:2023cv00334
Plaintiff:
Dexter Deangelo Holder
Defendant:
Keith Cooley, Col Holden, Col Tillery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andre Wong, et al v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc., et al
as 22-56113
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDRE WONG, AMADO MUNOZ, CAROLYN HEIER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC., a Delaware corporation and DOES, 1 through 50, inclusive
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
