Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01912
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Davis v. Holzapfel et al
as 5:2024cv00632
Defendant:
Mrs. Fox, Timothy Barnett, Mr. Sweeny and others
Plaintiff:
Elbryan T. Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Leslie v. Gutierrez et al
as 4:2024cv00535
Defendant:
Collette Peters, Timothy Barnett, M Rios-Marques and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Ryan Leslie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Davis v. Holzapfel et al
as 7:2024cv00747
Defendant:
Officer Mrs. Eary, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Timothy Barnett and others
Plaintiff:
Elbryan T. Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Barnett v. SNAP Inc.
as 4:2024cv03521
Defendant:
Snap Inc.
Plaintiff:
Timothy Barnett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Barnett v. SNAP Inc.
as 3:2024cv03069
Defendant:
SNAP Inc.
Plaintiff:
Timothy Barnett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Barnett v. SNAP Inc.
as 3:2024cv03068
Defendant:
SNAP Inc.
Plaintiff:
Timothy Barnett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death
Hubbard v. United States of America Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2023cv00832
Petitioner:
Marc Hubbard
Respondent:
United States of America Bureau of Prisons and Timothy Barnett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hill v. Ciolli
as 1:2023cv02539
Plaintiff:
David E. Hill
Defendant:
A. Ciolli, Andre Matevousian and Timothy Barnett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BARNETT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv52829
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY BARNETT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
