Cases 31 - 40 of 158
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv03041
Plaintiff:
TODD SMITH, SR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ARP II v. INDIANA STATE POLICE et al
as 1:2021cv02626
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL C ARP II
Defendant:
INDIANA STATE POLICE, DOUGLAS CARTER, Charles Sorrells and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2021cv14442
Plaintiff:
Todd Smith
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0416
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01310
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
CARRINGTON v. SMITH
as 1:2021cv00442
Defendant:
ATTORNEY TODD SMITH
Plaintiff:
THEODORE MACON CARRINGTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Thompson
as 1:2021cv02456
Defendant:
Terry Thompson
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Todd Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Khan v. Hemosphere Inc.
as 19-1952
Defendant:
F. NOEL PARENT, EARL SCHUMAN, KAUTILYA MEHTA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
LARRY D. FLANAGAN, JONATHAN R. MOLNAR, SHEPPARD MONDY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NAZIR KHAN and IFTIKHAR KHAN
Karl Niehaus v. Todd Smith et al
as 2:2021cv01671
Plaintiff:
Karl Niehaus and Karl Niehaus doing business as CREI Management
Defendant:
todd smith doing business as CREI management and laura ramirez espinoza doing business as CREI management
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv10432
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TODD SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Yonna Acosta, et al v. 3M Company, et al
as 20-3617
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Kyle Scruggs, Kris Douglas, Thomas Whitby and others
Defendant / Appellant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
