Cases 31 - 40 of 45
Mendoza v. USA et al
as 2:2012cv02956
Plaintiff:
Salvador Adam Mendoza
Defendant:
USA, Tony King, Victorian and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KING v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY et al
as 2:2012cv60153
Plaintiff:
TONY KING
Defendant:
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, FOSTER WHEELER LLC and HUNTINGTON INGALLS INCORPORATED
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
King v. General Electric Company et al
as 3:2012cv02299
Plaintiff:
Tony King
Defendant:
General Electric Company, Foster Wheeler LLC and Huntington Ingalls Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Powell v. Franklin County, Ohio et al
as 2:2012cv00070
Plaintiff:
Dawn Powell
Defendant:
Franklin County, Ohio, Zach Scott, Mark Barrett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conrad Burke v. David Everette
as 11-7408
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CONRAD BURKE
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID EVERETTE, Warden, T. MOORE, Nurse Supervisor and TONY KING, Inst. Physician
Burke v. Everette et al
as 1:2011cv00994
Plaintiff:
Conrad Burke
Defendant:
David Everette, T. Moore and Tony King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Giles et al
as 2:2010cv03054
Petitioner:
Tony King
Respondent:
J C Giles and Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Copeland v. King et al
as 2:2010cv00053
Plaintiff:
Delbert Copeland
Defendant:
Tony King and Tiffany Love
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Robinson v. Gene Johnson
as 09-7451
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM T. ROBINSON, a/k/a William Trone Robinson
Defendant - Appellee:
GENE M. JOHNSON, MARYLAND POPE, LINDA SHEAR and others
Robinson v. Prison Health Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv00249
Plaintiff:
William T. Robinson
Defendant:
Prison Health Services, Inc., Gene M. Johnson, Maryland L. Pope and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
