Cases 1 - 10 of 627
Torres v. North Carolina Department of Public Safety Adult Division et al
as 1:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Anthony Lee Torres
Defendant:
North Carolina Department of Public Safety Adult Division, Jeffery S. McGhee, Robert Brett Bullis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (National Origin)
Ramirez-Torres v. Rokosky
as 1:2024cv00133
Petitioner:
Patricio Ramirez-Torres
Respondent:
E. Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1217
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Bovain v. Torres et al
as 0:2024cv01110
Plaintiff:
Dino Bovain
Defendant:
Alejandro Torres and Hernandez-Santana's Sisters LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Linden v. Advance Auto Parts, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
KAMA LINDEN
Defendant:
Advance Auto Parts, Inc., Carla J. Bailo, John F. Ferraro and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00558
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Immigration: Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Haymond et al v Antero Resources Corporation
as 1:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Stephanie La Torre, Christin Palmer, Daniel Marsh Haymond, IV and others
Defendant:
Antero Resources Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Gervat v. Bailo et al
as 5:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Hugues Gervat
Defendant:
Carla J. Bailo, John F. Ferraro, Joan M. Hilson and others
Ramirez-Torres v. Rokosky
as 1:2024cv00060
Petitioner:
Patricio Ramirez-Torres
Respondent:
E. Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
