Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Roy Smith v. U.S. Marshal Fugitive Unit
as 23-7100
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROY MANDELL SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, KEVIN CONNOLLY, U.S. Marshal's Fugitive Unit, AARON KIRK, ValDosta GA Police Lieutenant and others
Smith v. Chesterfield VA Sheriff Department et al
as 1:2023cv01211
Plaintiff:
Roy Mandell Smith
Defendant:
Chesterfield VA Sheriff Department, Kevin Connolly, Aaron Kirk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CHAPMAN v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv00207
Petitioner:
TRACY CHAPMAN
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
MCLEOD v. CHAPMAN
as 7:2022cv00081
Plaintiff:
JERRY MCLEOD
Defendant:
TRACY CHAPMAN
Petitioner:
ROBERT BRUCE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00267
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
MCLEOD v. CHAPMAN et al
as 7:2019cv00137
Defendant:
BILLY INGRAM, TRACY CHAPMAN and MIKE DEWEY
Plaintiff:
JERRY MCLEOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Tracy Chapman v. Onika Tanya Maraj et al
as 2:2018cv09088
Defendant:
DOES 1 - 10, Onika Tanya Maraj and Does 1-10
Plaintiff:
Tracy Chapman
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
MCEADY v. CHAPMAN et al
as 7:2017cv00057
Plaintiff:
ARMASTER MCEADY
Defendant:
TRACY CHAPMAN, WADE KRUEGER, RICHARD M COWART and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MORRISON v. COWART et al
as 7:2017cv00012
Plaintiff:
RICHARD MORRISON
Defendant:
RICHARD M COWART, TRACY CHAPMAN and BETH C GREENE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Williams et al
as 6:2013cv00069
Plaintiff:
Roy Mandell Smith
Defendant:
Stanley Williams, James Deal, James Donald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
