Cases 11 - 20 of 120
COMPTON v. L. RICHARDSON PREYER FEDERAL BUILDING et al
as 1:2022cv00204
Plaintiff:
TRAE JAVAR COMPTON
Defendant:
L. RICHARDSON PREYER FEDERAL BUILDING, METROPOLITAN DETENTION CENTER L.A., DOCTOR T. SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Estate of Dion Lamar Taylor v. Corbin et al
as 1:2022cv00634
Plaintiff:
Estate of Dion Lamar Taylor
Defendant:
Officer Trae Corbin, Officer Gershom Byrnes, Baltimore County Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Brodnik v. Commissioner of Social Secuity
as 3:2021cv09983
Plaintiff:
Trae Steven Brodnik
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Secuity
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Robinson v. Chilton County Jail et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00777
Plaintiff:
Tabeus Dewayne Robinson
Defendant:
Chilton County Jail, Ann Davis, Trae Barfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COMPTON v. MILLS et al
as 1:2021cv00811
Plaintiff:
TRAE JAVAR COMPTON
Defendant:
JUDGE J. MILLS and JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
COMPTON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2021cv00749
Plaintiff:
TRAE JAVAR COMPTON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LOZANO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv39072
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS TRAE LOZANO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LIBERTY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv35909
Plaintiff:
TRAE LAVAR LIBERTY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CARPENTER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv23629
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TRAE CARPENTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Crandell v. Hudgins
as 1:2021cv00063
Petitioner:
Trae Hakeem Crandell
Respondent:
R. Hudgins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
