Cases 1 - 10 of 82
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02651
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Hill, Sr. v. Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Aaron Tremell Hill, Sr. and Aaron Tremell Hill, Sr
Defendant:
Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hill, Sr. v. City of Monahans et al
as 4:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Aaron Tremell Hill, Sr. and Aaron Tremell Hill, Sr
Defendant:
City of Monahans, Rex Thee, Luis Esquivel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hughes v. Fagan
as 4:2024cv00741
Petitioner:
Darren Tremell Hughes
Respondent:
Sheriff Eric Fagan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jenkins v. Abbassi
as 4:2023cv00285
Plaintiff:
Tremel Jenkins
Defendant:
Bijan Abbassi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TREMELLING v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv01588
Plaintiff:
BRETT P TREMELLING
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lewis v. State of Georgia
as 1:2023cv02766
Petitioner:
Tremel Orlando Lewis
Respondent:
State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Richardson v. Muhammad McCray, et al
as 1:2023cv03637
Plaintiff:
Jamie Lamont Richardson
Defendant:
Jeelan M Muhammad McCray,, Maria L Torres, Sarah O. Iguodala and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BLACK v. WARDEN
as 1:2023cv00734
Petitioner:
TREMEL BLACK
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones-Bey v. Sirius-El
as 23-136
Plaintiff / Appellant:
E. Jones-Bey
Defendant / Appellee:
Yusef Sirius-El, Grand Sheik, Walter Clendenin-Bey, Assistant Grand Sheik, CW Harmony-Bey, Assistant Secretary and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
