Cases 11 - 20 of 245
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00035
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
In re: David Paddison
as 23-30372
Petitioner:
In re: David R. Paddison
Respondent:
Hawley Troxell Ennis & Hawley, L.L.P.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00252
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Shannon Troxell v. United States of America
as 5:2023cv00771
Plaintiff:
Shannon Troxell
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and DOES 1 through 25, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Troxell v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv00392
Plaintiff:
Timothy Troxell
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Todd Ashker, et al v. Gavin Newsom, et al
as 23-15154
Plaintiff / Appellee:
TODD LEWIS ASHKER, DANNY TROXELL, GEORGE RUIZ and others
Defendant / Appellant:
GAVIN NEWSOM, Governor of the State of California, MATTHEW CATE, ANTHONY CHAUS, Chief, Office of Correctional Safety, CDCR and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
(PS) Tezak v. Wilburn et al
as 2:2022cv02219
Plaintiff:
William M. Tezak
Defendant:
Robert Wilburn, Ian Troxell, Terra Lynne Avilla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jordanoff v. Troxel, et al
as 22-6178
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES JORDANOFF, IV
Defendant / Appellee:
AMANDA HAEZE TROXEL, Individually and In official capacity as an officer at Lexington assessment and reception center, FNU WEAVER, In official capacity as Captain at Joseph Harp Correctional Center and FNU KEMBREL, Case Worker
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
