Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Sanders v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et al.
as 23-4110
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TROY SANDERS
Defendant / Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, COUNTY OF KERN, RAYBON JOHNSON and others
Troy Sanders v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv04832
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Troy Sanders
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Troy Sanders v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2023cv05047
Plaintiff:
TROY SANDERS
Defendant:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, COUNTY OF KERN and RAYBON "R.C." JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Sanders v. County of Kern et al
as 1:2022cv01029
Plaintiff:
Troy Sanders
Defendant:
County of Kern, Detective Victor Garcia, Detective Randall Meyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SANDERS v. ISMAILOV et al
as 3:2022cv00084
Plaintiff:
TROY SANDERS
Defendant:
SEIDALI NMI ISMAILOV and MANAS EXPRESS CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Branch Banking and Trust Company v. SS Tactical LLC et al
as 2:2016mc00095
Plaintiff:
Branch Banking and Trust Company
Defendant:
SS Tactical LLC and Darren Troy Sanders
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY v. SS TACTICAL LLC et al
as 5:2016cv00091
Plaintiff:
BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY
Defendant:
SS TACTICAL LLC and DARRON TROY SANDERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McGee et al v. Thor Industries, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv07830
Plaintiff:
Ella McGee, Ella McGee, Ella McGee and others
Defendant:
Thor Industries, Inc., Bechtel National Inc., CH2M Hill Construction, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
