Cases 41 - 50 of 856
Vazquez v. Kauffman et al
as 1:2023cv00359
Plaintiff:
Francisco M Vazquez
Defendant:
Mark Kauffman, Derrick Bowlby, Luke Beaver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02104
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 American with Disabilities Act (ADA- Accommodations)
TUTTLE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv21180
Plaintiff:
EDGAR TUTTLE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Tuttle v. USA
as 8:2023cv00321
Petitioner:
Lacee Tuttle
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Delapaz et al v. HCA Healthcare, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00718
Plaintiff:
Laura Delapaz and Joshua Tuttle-Maceina
Defendant:
HCA Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Silvers et al v. HCA Healthcare, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00684
Plaintiff:
Gary Silvers and Richard Marous
Defendant:
HCA Healthcare, Inc.
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Gregory Crossman, Marissa Aragon, Abby Rubenfeld and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Smith (PS) et al v. WCDTF et al
as 1:2023cv01738
Plaintiff:
Nathan J Smith and Holly M Smith
Defendant:
WCDTF, GJPD, Sherrifs Office and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00100
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1595
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Stewart v. Stewart et al
as 5:2023cv02951
Plaintiff:
Thomas Stewart, Jr
Defendant:
Jeremy Stewart, Karen Tuttle, Stephen Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
