Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Tyler Thompson v. Clayton County, Georgia, et al
as 26-11429
Plaintiff:
TYLER THOMPSON
Defendant:
CLAYTON COUNTY, GEORGIA, LEVON ALLEN, SEAN HOLLINSHEAD and others
Thompson v. Fredrick
as 3:2025cv02601
Petitioner:
Tyler Thompson
Respondent:
Warden George A. Fredrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stevens v. Lincoln County Nevada et al
as 2:2025cv01662
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jacob Stevens
Defendant:
Lincoln County Nevada, Sgt. Bailey, Sheriff Foremaster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson-Copeland v. Church et al
as 1:2025cv01675
Plaintiff:
Tyler Thompson-Copeland
Defendant:
Lt. R. Church, Jr., Director Walt Pesterfield, Sgt. Austin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Clayton County, Georgia et al
as 1:2025cv02846
Plaintiff:
Tyler Thompson
Defendant:
Clayton County, Georgia, Sheriff Levon Allen, Sean Hollinshead and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thompson v. Walls et al
as 1:2025cv00044
Plaintiff:
Charles Tyler Thompson, Sr.
Defendant:
Lt. Jerry Walls and Sgt. Shiloh J. Harden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Avery v. Thompson et al
as 3:2024cv00283
Plaintiff:
Shenita Avery
Defendant:
Tyler Thompson, Liz J. Shepherd and Jack Tolliver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
THOMPSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv24503
Plaintiff:
TYLER THOMPSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Davis v. Thompson et al
as 1:2023cv01071
Plaintiff:
Devonte Davis
Defendant:
Tyler Thompson, Anthony Peterson and Mark Wood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
THOMPSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv01341
Plaintiff:
TYLER THOMPSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
