Cases 1 - 10 of 1,028
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01148
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00532
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
WAKEFERN FOOD CORP. v. TYSON FOODS, INC.
as 2:2024cv08933
Defendant:
TYSON FOODS, INC.
Plaintiff:
WAKEFERN FOOD CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Taylor v. Tyson Foods, Inc.
as 2:2024cv02591
Plaintiff:
Cedric Taylor
Defendant:
Tyson Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02359
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Tyson Foods, Inc. et al v. Skaggs et al
as 1:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
Tyson Chicken, Inc. and Tyson Foods, Inc.
Defendant:
Elijah Skaggs, Does 1-6, Skaggs Bros & Sons Farms LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv03559
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Harrison v. Tyson Foods, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00433
Plaintiff:
Randal Harrison
Defendant:
Tyson Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00108
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Grandview Poultry, LLP v. Tyson Foods, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00133
Plaintiff:
Grandview Poultry, LLP
Defendant:
Tyson Chicken, Inc., Mark Avery, Tyson Foods, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
