Cases 1 - 10 of 125
Bonilla v. U. S. Government
as 4:2024cv05993
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
U. S. Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plichalski v. U S Government Veterans Adm.
as 1:2024cv01435
Plaintiff:
Walter M Plichalski
Defendant:
U S Government Veterans Adm.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. U S Government et al
as 8:2024cv04393
Defendant:
U S Government, Anderson County, South Carolina Judicial System and others
Plaintiff:
Tommy Dwayne Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Garcia v. Unknown Staff
as 24-40318
Plaintiff:
Antonio A. Garcia
Defendant:
Unknown Staff, Director FNU Parker, U S Government and others
Garcia v. U S Government
as 24-40294
Plaintiff:
Antonio A. Garcia
Defendant:
U S Government and District Court of Guadelupe County, Texas
Garcia v. U.S. Government
as 24-40153
Plaintiff:
Antonio A. Garcia
Defendant:
U S Government, Texas and U.S. Legislators and District Court of Guadelupe County, Texas
Ruiz v. U S Government
as 5:2023cv00106
Petitioner:
Rafael Verdejo Ruiz
Respondent:
U S Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Daniel Cobble v. U.S. Government
as 23-6437
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL ERIC COBBLE, a/k/a Johnathan Wayne Plemons, a/k/a Daniel Castleberry, a/k/a Daniel Eric Cobble
Defendant / Appellee:
U S GOVERNMENT, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS DIRECTOR and others
JOHNSON v. BRAGG et al
as 5:2022cv04365
Plaintiff:
Jarrel Lee Johnson
Defendant:
Travis Bragg, Charles Lemon, David Andrew Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
JOHNSON v. BRAGG et al
as 4:2022cv00180
Plaintiff:
JARREL LEE JOHNSON
Defendant:
Warden TRAVIS BRAGG, CHARLES LEMON, DAVID ANDREW COOK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
