Cases 1 - 10 of 99,596
Patrick v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv04075
Petitioner:
Lonzo Patrick
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Muhammad et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Kariem Qaadir Muhammad, Jamual Famin Muhammad, Danny Dermill Daniels and others
Defendant:
United States of America, Denver, City of and Aurora, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lidge v. USA
as 5:2024cv00769
Petitioner:
Kevin R. Lidge
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Waters v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv05027
Plaintiff:
Garrett Waters
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Foster v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00530
Petitioner:
Lonnell J. Foster
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Maurice Owen v. United States
as 24-1887
Plaintiff:
Maurice Antonio Owen, also known as Maurice Antonio Parham
Defendant:
United States of America
Staton v. USA
as 2:2024cv11130
Petitioner:
Christopher Staton
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Little v. United States of America - B.O.P et al
as 1:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
Randall Little
Defendant:
United States of America - B.O.P, C Stern, Dr. FNU Winger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diego v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00219
Petitioner:
Donnell Dwayne Diego
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
USA v. Vontez Scales
as 24-1779
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
VONTEZ SCALES, also known as Tez
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
