Cases 1 - 10 of 99,623
Oxford v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00031
Petitioner:
Carmen Michelle Oxford
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Muhammad v. United States of America Federal Government Official Officer, Agents et al
as 8:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
Kariem Qaadir Muhammad
Defendant:
United States of America Federal Government Official Officer, Agents, The City of Denver and The City of Aurora
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garza-Guerra v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00740
Plaintiff:
Miguel Angel Garza Guerra
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Davis v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00458
Petitioner:
Justin Demetrius Davis
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Patrick v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv50165
Petitioner:
Lonzo Patrick
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Janczuk v. United States of America (USA) et al
as 1:2024cv03268
Plaintiff:
Weronika E. Janczuk
Defendant:
United States of America (USA), Judicial & Personnel Teams USA Courthouse Federal (SDNY), Federal Defenders of New York (FDNY) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GOLDNER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv01868
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL GOLDNER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Suarez Villa v. United States of America, The
as 0:2024cv01584
Petitioner:
Eduardo Suarez Villa
Respondent:
United States of America, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
US v. Maurice Geter
as 24-6405
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MAURICE DARNELL GETER, a/k/a Rease
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
