Cases 51 - 60 of 63
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv02674
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
DILLEY v. BURRIDGE et al
as 5:2012cv01133
Plaintiff:
BUTLER FREDERICK DILLEY
Defendant:
TERRANCE BURRIDGE, US XPRESS, INC., US EXPRESS LEASING, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cole v. Agnew et al
as 2:2012cv00055
Plaintiff:
Kathy L. Cole
Defendant:
Michael Agnew, Total Transportation of Mississippi, LLC and US Xpress, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00181
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Southside LLC v. US Xpress Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00908
Plaintiff:
Southside LLC
Defendant:
US Xpress Inc. and US Xpress Enterprises Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fitzgerald v. US XPress, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv01686
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Fitzgerald
Defendant:
US XPress, Inc., Robert Paul Strickland, Great West Casualty Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2010cv00111
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Kabasinskas v. Haskin et al
as 5:2009cv01407
Plaintiff:
Lenore Kabasinskas
Defendant:
William R Haskin, George W Wesley, II, US Xpress Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Kabasinskas v. Haskin et al
as 8:2009cv00369
Plaintiff:
Lenore Kabasinskas
Defendant:
Bill R. Haskin, US Xpress, Inc., US Xpress Enterprises, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Jackson et al v. US Xpress Enterprises Inc et al
as 7:2009cv02320
Plaintiff:
Ronald Jackson and Gloria Jackson
Defendant:
US Xpress Enterprises Inc, US Xpress Enterprises Inc, US Xpress Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
